In a March 30, 2015, response to my public records request, the Atlanta Police Department said that it didn’t have a non-disclosure agreement with the FBI or other records related to Harris Corporation equipment.
Dustin Slaughter wrote for The Declaration on April 2, 2014 that the Pennsylvania State Police had StingRays from Harris Corporation since at least December 2013.
In a March 30, 2015, response to my public records request, the Pennsylvania State Police acknowledged that responsive records included “a four page correspondence dated August 18, 2011, from the FBI to PSP [Pennsylvania State Police] marked law enforcement sensitive and a two page agreement between Harris and PSP.” The response also states, “The PSP, upon receipt of a request(s) for cellular telephone surveillance records, confers with the FBI in contemplation of a response to the request(s) as the FBI provides guidance as to the legal dissemination of records pertaining to cellular telephone surveillance request(s)….PSP has had telephone contact with Harris Corporation. PSP notifies the FBI upon receipt of request(s) for information on cellular telephone surveillance records.”
This means that the Pennsylvania State Police have possessed Harris StingRays since 2011, two years earlier than the previously disclosed documents.
On July 21, 2009, the Anchorage Assembly approved the purchase of a KingFish Dual-Mode system from Harris Wireless Products Group (Harris Corporation) for $109,600, plus $9,600 to train four officers of the Anchorage Police Department. The background material for the meeting included a June 24, 2009, memo (Old link – broken) detailing the capabilities of the KingFish system:
- Identify location of an active cellular device to within 25 feet of actual location anywhere in the United States
- Track the route of any active cellular device and record tracking information for evidentiary purposes
- Mimic the functional appearance of an active cellular service tower
- Interrupt service to active cellular connection
- Prevent connection to identified cellular device (“No Service”)
During the meeting, Anchorage Police Chief Rob Huen added,
This is funded by a Homeland Security Grant. And it provides a capability of tracking suspect’s cell phone and additionally the ability to interrupt specific signals. For instance if somebody had an IED device and we had information regarding that. The Alaska FBI has such a device. They have one of them with one operator. Unfortunately coordination and availability of that specific unit and operator have made share use almost impossible. Now this is….when you talk about the cooperative purchase of this. This is actually purchased off a GSA federal contract with a federal grant in lieu of going sole source here locally. So, before we utilize this thing, you have to remember, we have to get a warrant for the phone number. It’s very closely controlled. And so the warrant that is needed to access the phone number. Once we get that, then we use the device to locate the cell phone of a suspect. Once we locate it, we need to get another warrant to access where that phone’s located – say its located in a home or a car. So there’s strict protections on that. And one of the other things that the device is capable of doing and we are prohibited by federal law from doing is using it to eavesdrop on conversations. We cannot do that. Only the NSA and Homeland Security can do that.
On January 28, 2015, I filed a public records request for a copy of the non-disclosure agreement between the Anchorage Police Department and the FBI. The request was acknowledged in a letter dated March 18, 2015, but no response has been received yet.